The Russian provisional government 1917 pt2 | The History Faculty

Access this resource

Podcast on the Russian Provisional Government. The Russian Provisional Government is discussed by historians as a failure. It is presented as not taking decisive action on a range of pressing issues, and therefore, having lost popular support, was easily removed from power by the Bolsheviks in October 1917. This talk gives a more sympathetic account of the range of problems confronting the Provisional Government, arguing that it was undermined largely by factors outside its control: the war, a revolution in the countryside, the lack of equilibrium in exchange between town and countryside; an urban economic crisis; the break-up of the late-imperial state through national movements; a lack of international backing; the unique environment of Petrograd. The main failings of the Provisional Government came during Kerensky’s leadership, most notably the disastrous Kornilov Affair. We should also note the great success of the Provisional Government – the fact that it did arrange elections to the Constituent Assembly in very trying and difficult conditions.

Suitable for A-Level

Original URL:

Resource Type : video

90 visits / 10 Like(s) (Like this resource)

Licence CC-BY-NC-SA

Cite : The Russian provisional government 1917 pt2 | The History Faculty ( by I. Thatcher licensed as CC-BY-NC-SA (

Reuse : Web link

About Richard Marshall

Richard Marshall is studying for a doctorate in the literature of ancient Rome at Wadham College, Oxford, and is a tutor for Ancient History at St Benet’s Hall. In addition to Classics, he has a long-standing interest in the tactics and material culture of the British Army, especially of the period spanned by the Cardwell Reforms and First World War. He has a large collection of original uniform and equipment items used for teaching and research purposes, and is currently exploring the evolution of British military clothing and accoutrements in response to changes in fashion and warfare for eventual publication. He previously worked as a cataloguer for the Oxford University Great War Archive.
This entry was posted in Consent, Dissent and Revolution, Teaching. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply